Principles of diversity equality Essay Example for Free

Principles of diversity equality EssayOutcome 1 generalize the importance of diversity, equality and inclusion. 1.1 Define what is meant byDiversity- Is that right of each individual to be different and to have differences from some others. Equality- the state of being equal, curiously in status, rights or opportunities. Inclusion- the correspondion or state of including or being included within a throng or structure. Discrimination- the below the belt or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people, especi totallyy on the grounds of race, age or sex. 1.2 Describe how direct or indirect discrimination whitethorn occur in the work setting. Direct discrimination Institutional/Company different pay levels offered for the same job, promotion offers to only a select throng of employees job offers and training opportunities being offered to individuals of a certain race or age bullying, excluding others, provocations of colleagues or clients on the basis of their gen der, age, religious beliefs, ethnicity, language, social class, sexual orientation. corroborative discrimination Inadequate facilities put in site for those with disabilities, making demands on workforce which they deem as being disadvantageous to employees of a certain group using overly complex terminology when providing information either members of staff or the clientsRead more Describe the potential effects of discrimination bear witness1.3 Explain how practices that support diversity, equality and inclusion reduce the likelihood of discrimination. Mixing groups of individuals in situations like training sessions encourages cohesion and fosters the opportunities for individuals to work well with each other in partnership. Introducing facilities that aid mobility as this encourages the involvement of individuals who are less mobile and makes them feel included as their needs are being taken into account. place in place polices that empower employees and show the individuals value to the company such as employee of the month awards and bonuses given for consistent good work. This will increase the employees sureness in carrying out their job and want tocontinue their employment contract with the company.Outcome 2 Know how to work in an inclusive way.2.1 List separate legislations and codes of practice relating to diversity, equality, inclusion and discrimination in adult social care settings.Equalities Act (2001).The Employment Act (2008).Health and Social Care Act (2012). merciful Rights Act (1998).Mental Capacity Act (2005).Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act (2006).2.2 Describe how to interact with individuals in an inclusive way. Being empathetic towards the clients situation and showing a genuine interest in their concerns and needs. Allowing and encouraging a two-way dialogue to occur between the care worker and the client using techniques such as active listening to aid communication. Respecting individuals cultural and/or religious differences and working with them in a way that doesnt go against their beliefs or morals.2.3 Describe ways in which discrimination may be challenged in adult social care settings. Putting in place a company policy of zero-tolerance regarding discrimination. Informing all members of staff and clients about how and when to make complaints regarding any issues of concern including discrimination. Encouraging others to challenge discrimination.Maintaining a record of discriminatory behaviour and resorting to disciplinary actions to deal with such behaviour. routinely updating policies and procedures of organisation in relation to discrimination. Using previous discriminatory cases to aid the continuous professional development of the members of staff as they can act as an example of how they can respond and handle similar situations if and when they occur in their future working life with the company.Outcome 3 Know how to approaching information, advice and support about diversity, equality, incl usion and discrimination. 3.1 Identify sources ofinformation, advice and support about diversity, equality, inclusion and discrimination.Company care worker handbook.Skills for care website.Heath Social Care information Centre website.NHS website.Healthcare Diversity Council website.3.2 Describe how and when to access information, advice and support about diversity, equality, inclusion and discrimination. An individual should access information, advice and support about diversity, equality, inclusion and discrimination in instances where they believe that either them or the client who they are assisting being treated unfairly due to factors like an individuals race or ethnicity having access to the relevant legislative rules and regulations such as the Equalities Act (2001) or The Employment Act (2008) and the companys policies and procedures regarding diversity, equality, inclusion and discrimination so that they know exactly what their employer is legally required to put into pla ce in order to foster diversity, equality, inclusion and prevent discrimination. This information especially the companys policies and procedures will also inform the care worker of the proper procedure that needs to occur when the care worker experiences issues regarding diversity, equality, inclusion and discrimination.

A declaration of war justify behaviour Essay Example for Free

A declaration of war justify behaviour EssayWhether or not the declaration of simply War justifies behaviour that is morally or legally unaccept fitted in peace clock time depends firstly on the sort of behaviour we are talking about. There are a number of behaviours that are legally permitted in peacetime that many people would and do reject as morally unacceptable. This includes abortion, euthanasia and animal dependables. The legal acceptableness of these issues depends on the government, and varies from state to state.In this country, during peacetime it is acceptable to kill in egotism defence for instance, if ones house is being robbed and the burglar threatens the owner, the owner would not be penalized for wound and cleansing the burglar. Pacifists object to all anatomys of killing in both war and peacetime, whereas just war co-occurrenceers try to draw parallels between civil justice and global justice in the attempt to justify certain behaviour. There are al so behaviors such as propaganda, espionage and deliberate infringement of human rights that are to a greater extent doubtful and are usually seen as unacceptable in peacetime.Certain examples of violent behaviour in peacetime in hindsight appear unacceptable, yet at the time those guilty were not prosecuted. There fetch been a number of incidents when armed Police officers have shot dead suspects who were not carrying a weapon. None of the jurisprudence officers who killed those people were convicted. This is because killing in defence of innocent life is acceptable in peacetime, and the boundaries and conditions can be bended to suit the individual.Pacifists believe that therefore no killing can be acceptable on deontological grounds. near religious people argue for the absolute sanctity of human life they would say that ideally no incidental killings would develop place if all killing was prohibited. Thus, this position would assume that a declaration of war does not justify a ny kind of killing either. Christian absolutists believe they are following the example of Jesus Christ by refusing to resort to violence, even if they have been treated cruelly. Therefore a declaration of just war would not be able to justify any unacceptable behaviour such as murder and violence this would save further divide men, who are already divided by sin.Nevertheless, those who support the Just War theory believe that killing in the name of resisting an inequitable oppressor is justifiable. The declaration of just war must be a proportionate response, and must discriminate between the guilty and the innocent. Oliver ODonovan suggests war is an act of armed perspicaciousness and must be carried out by an unbiased judge to ensure its fairness. This judge must have a clear perspective on the gains and losings this act would entail and the final aim must be to bring about peace. In theory, military aggression is not defined by killing and violence.For instance, British troop s that entered Iraq do not kill unless attack. Therefore killing is still self defence and this is no different to peacetime. Walzer thinks killing in self defence is justifiable and supports the theory of legalist paradigm. This means interstate justice basically reinforces the civil legal system, but on a larger scale it is analogous. The right of a given state to defend itself must be accepted, just as an individual has the right to do the same. Walzer believed whichever side begins aggression to be automatically in the wrong.There is also the question of propaganda and whether it becomes appropriate to mislead people into thinking in a certain way in order for them to support the supposedly just war movement. In a healthy and functioning democracy during peacetime it is prohibited to lie to citizens or conceal the truth of political work. Some would argue that in wartime morale need to be boosted However, when a nation is at war, its citizens are often indoctrinated via mass m edia with the sort of messages that would disorientate their judgment and cabal hatred for the enemy. Propoganda can lead to disproportionate warfare and killings, therefore it cannot be justified.Human rights have always been an issue, for it is no certain whether it is morally right to abjure someone the right to life in favour of another objective. From a utilitarian perspective, it would depend on whether the war was successful. If more people than soldiers killed are able to lead happy and fulfilled lives after the war ends, then it is acceptable to justify military confrontation in wartime.However, The High Court has recently obstinate that it soldiers human rights should not be overlooked either. This means the Ministry of Defence has to ensure the soldiers are not subjected to combat in intolerable heat or cold, and have functioning equipment. Certain equipment would be forbidden entirely, such as Nimrod planes. Of course, this would affect the damage potential of British troops, and possibly extend the war and subsequently take more lives. A utilitarian critic would ask whether in the long term this court order is going to cause more death and pain.

Nonmaleficence Pillars Of Health System

Nonmaleficence Pillars Of Health SystemAbstractBeneficence and Nonmaleficence argon the main pillars of the wellness forethought system. These deuce estimable conventions seem to be the foundation and set a basic frame fashion for the practice of wellness care. Hippocrates recognized the signifi put upce of these two principles and he promise to practice healthcare following them (Morrison 48). The function of these two principles go beyond treatment of patients, in fact, it is relevant when dealing with the healthcare round. As a health care administrator it is vital to create a working environs that runs by the two ethical principles as well as the ethical principle of justice. Justice comes into comprise be work it is a healthcare administrators responsibility and obligation to induce sure that separately individual staff members is organism treated fairly and equally. Thus, ethical issues that are raised in the workplace, specifically, in a health care facility, mo re often are associated with the principles of nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice. A health care administrator is judge to follow all ethical guidelines in the practice of health care. The principle of nonmaleficence is to save deadening from occurring or the duty to avoid impairmenting others (Morrison 48). This is associated with the treatment of patients which should be through with(p) with care and non carelessly. Additionally, the patients autonomy should not be violated under any circumstance in order to prevent potential harm from victorious place. In the U.S. Hostile Workplace Survey that was taken in the year 2000 showed that about one out of six workers in a workplace catch most type of bullying that occurred within the last six months (ahanews.com). This shows that some health care administrators are not fully looking after their healthcare facilities and this is allowing bullying to take place. In this case, the healthcare administrator is not doing his/he r job in preventing harm, and is therefore not following the ethical principle of nonmaleficence. Furthermore, nonmaleficence goes beyond merely preventing physical harm that might take place during a treatment procedure such as surgery, but it also refers to preventing any harm from occurring to the staff and healthcare facility. The benefits and harms are most often weighed against each other in health care to guide what needs to be done. It is a responsibility of the health care administrator to construct an environment that is not harmful for the employees or staff members. In addition to preventing harm to patients, you must prevent any harm from occurring to the staff as well. The issues of discrimination, bullying and harassment, including sexual harassment in the working environment must be fully and openly addressed. These topics should be taken in as being intolerable and potential harm should be prevented to the employees in risk of these. Moreover, any type of bullying that may occur in the work force should be prevented. Bullying in the workforce is extremely prevalent and this most commonly leads to depression and move morale of the individual staff member being bullied. There should be a positive environment in the work area for open discussion and no fear of judgment in the case of telling the HCA about the bullying. There should be an ease to talk to the HCA, and he/she should create an open relationship with the staff so there is fastidious guidelines needed to be followed, but an openness to speak about issues of bullying, discrimination, or harassment. There should be a procedure to report someone who is harassed and they should not feel fear of reprisal for mentioning the issue. The supervisor should not be so strict or to a fault lenient be take a shit the staff could be scared or withal comfortable with him/her. In order to be fair and equal and prevent any harm by being too strict or too lenient, the principles of justice and nonma leficence need to be followed. Bullying stooge include intimidating and disruptive behaviors which can cause significant issues for a staff member who is experiencing lowered morale. The staff member being bullied could have trouble caring for the patient as effectively, thus can cause poor patient felicity. affected role care in a healthcare facility is reliant on teamwork, communication, and a collaborative work environment. It is important to provide a safe environment and to do so a health care professional who is experiencing bullying or seeing it occur should report it or address the issue. Addressing the issue is truly crucial to the success of performance and patient care. The joint effort is needed in health care organizations and a mere act of bullying can affect the entire healthcare facility by lowering the morale and lowering the teamwork and interaction. This is obviously causing harm and the principle of nonmaleficence is not coming into play when bullying has occ urred. Therefore, the health care administrator should adopt a code of conduct in order to follow guidelines and ensure that the staff members are abstemious what is bullying. Additionally, it is essential to create and implement a process for managing disruptive and inappropriate behaviors in the workplace (newworkplace.wordpress.com). This will ensure that e very(prenominal) staff member is being treated fairly and the principle of justice is being followed.More commonly it has been seen that bosses are one of the main sources of bullying. Physicians oftentimes feel that they might know ameliorate or more than nurses and treat them unfairly which is going against the principle of nonmaleficence because they are directly causing harm instead of preventing harm. It was seen in one situation that a physician refused to allow his staff member to go to the bathroom which was insulting as well as inappropriate bullying. The National Accrediting Agency now requires of some hospitals to adopt a code of conduct which addresses issues of bullying. Intimidating behavior or bullying can cause staff members to become submissive because of the bullying has cause psychological harm to the individual and this oftentimes leads to medical errors and errors in patient care (workplacebullying.org). A health care administrator has the responsibility of being attentive of what is going on in the working environment around him/her and to recognize any social closing off issues, belittling, and overload of work on one special(a) employee. Segregation and isolation oftentimes occurs ascribable to bullying, however, sometimes it refers to cultural differences. It was seen that the staff members at a particular hospital were critical of the other Latino or Spanish-speaking employees and this caused a rift. There was obvious prejudice and stereotyping because the staff did not communicate with the Latino staff members as much, which caused language discrimination (gradworks.umi.co m). This discrimination caused isolation of one particular group and it could and should have been spotted easily by the HCA whose responsibility it is to recognize instances of discrimination and isolation. This situation is also associated with racial discrimination which elbow room that a group is isolated due to their ethnicity. It is thus the HCAs responsibility to prevent harm and act on the principle of nonmaleficence he/she should also ensure that the ethical principle of justice is being practiced by the staff members and everyone is treated fairly and equally. By fixing the problem and causing the staff members to accept each other the health care administrator would be figure outing about good which is acting on the ethical principle of beneficence. Racial discrimination is very common when it comes to the workplace. Many have felt that they were refused a promotion because their ethnicity or race. Nurses, specifically Caucasian nurses, felt isolated and discriminated b y nurses of different ethnicities. The other nurses who wheel spoke a non-English language seem to exclude Caucasian nurses which cause segregation and is something that should be prevented in the work place (diversityof.net). The impact of this isolation can cause low team effort and cause patient care to be poor. National surveys have shown that many physicians that are of a racial/ethnic minority often feel isolated and racially discriminated in the working environment. Racial discrimination among physicians in the workplace causes lower rates of promotion and career satisfaction when compared with nonminority physician peers with similar productivity (nmanet.org). Ultimately, this has caused a poor working environment and discrimination causes harm to the staff members as well as the health care organization. In addition to preventing harm, a health care provider must also do good for the patients, which is the principle of beneficence. Beneficence refers to the obligation a H CA has to his/her patients in providing fair treatment that will benefit them, protecting patients autonomous rights and providing aid for anyone in need. It is also an obligation of a health care administrator to bring about good in the workplace and make sure it is a safe working environment for his staff. There should be an appreciation which comes with this principle and should be displayed to the staff members in order to encourage them to always do better and continue to have a high morale. An HCA should balance the benefits and potential harms by decision making the costs against benefits and deciding what would provide the greatest good. The principle of beneficence should always be reinforced in order for the staff members to apply this ethical principle daily. Staff should be treated with beneficence in order for them to treat patients using this same principle. It is the responsibility of the administrator to be encouraging and compassionate towards the staff and to prev ent negative attitudes which can lower the morale and cause potential harm. Also, an administrator should always offer assistance whereas being too authoritative would make the staff uneasy. Undoubtedly, the administrator should work on the weaknesses of the staff members and build upon their strengths in order for each individual to use their strengths for the good of the health care organization. Furthermore, downsize in the workplace which include laying-off employees can affect the employees that are laid off as well as the staff members who are left mite guilty and cannot work as efficiently due to this guilt. An HCA should not be keeping silent in a time when laying off is occurring because it can lead to rumors spreading around the workplace and a situation can become worse than it really is. Also, it can cause employees to be stressed and upset, which inescapably causes harm. After the lay-off has occurred, there should be open forums and discussion in order to be aware o f everyones feelings towards the issue. The work place should be safe and healthy as well as have a positive atmosphere in order for there to be no fear of judgment which will prevent harm from happening such as harassment, bullying, or discrimination. The ethical issues raised in the workplace can range from bullying, discrimination, to harassment. These issues in the workplace cause harm to the staff members due to lowered morale and poor working efficiency. Discrimination can isolate and segregate groups of people or one person due to ethnicity, which would be racial discrimination or by other factors involved. This inevitably causes harm and not everyone is being treated fairly, thus the principle of nonmaleficence and justice are not being applied. Beneficence should be used when creating an environment that is safe and positive for the staff members to feel comfortable enough to report bullying, discrimination or harassment. Nonmaleficence, justice and beneficence are intercon nected and work together in many situations for good ethical decision making. The relationship between the employee and administrator and the staff members themselves should be positive if using these three principles.

Geographic Profiling of Serial Offenders

Geographic Profiling of Serial OffendersAs psychological profiling seems to garner totally the attention with television shows that feature FBI profilers, one should be reminded that there is another mode of criminal profiling that, while less glamorous, seems to provide a genuinely risque degree of reliability. The other method is geographic profiling that had it beginnings in a London crime spree involving a serial rapist. In these cases occurring in the mid-1990s, stumped police called in David Canter, Professor of Psychology at the University of Surrey to assist. After analyzing crime data superimposed over a map, Professor Canter made the mite that the perpetrator was to be found in a very specific geographic theater of operations based upon these furloughs of crime (Wilson 2002, pp. 14-16).Subsequent retroactive studies have corroborate a number of precepts regarding the proposition that one cannister predict the base of criminals from computerized algorithms that use g enerally one of two validated heuristic methods. In fact, of the field defined by a search algorithm that states that is inclusive of a circle defined by the two furthermost crime scenes, fully 51% of the serial rapist offenders lived within the first 5% of the defined area and an overwhelming lived within 87% of the first 25% of the defined search area (Canter, Coffey, Huntley, Missen 2000, p. 457). This algorithm holds regardless of the crime as indicated by the table below (Canter, et al 2000, p. 458)In addition to the circle algorithm described above, another method utilized is the Decay method with analyzes data from the assumption that perpetrators consecrate crimes near where they live. This method is based upon the idea that crimes decay as the distance to the criminals residence decrease, in effect, creating something of a buffer zone immediately surrounding their house (Snook, Taylor, Bennell 2004, p. 107 Canter, Coffey, Huntley, Missen 2000, pp. 459-460).Somewhat a h andst these two algorithms are the approximately 10% of perpetrators that are labeled as commuters and do not live near the crime scene (Snook, Taylor, Bennell 2004, p. 117). Nevertheless, in these cases as in the easier to classify marauder-type crimes, there is the idea that criminals proceed from a base of familiarity such as a home or workplace or other personally significant locale or the driveway that connects them. While instructioning on geography, this brings into the consideration the important psychological construct of mental maps in that the location must have significance from the perspective of the perpetrator it need not be an actual geographic landmark to have psychological significance that plays out geo-centrically (Holmes Holmes 1996, p. 152). As such it is no surprise that some(prenominal) methods are reliable and that there is a significant degree of overlap in the two model predictions.Of greater occupys to both researchers and law enforcement are unsa fe crimes such as murder, rape, arson and burglary. While there is likely a logical high correlation between other petty crimes such as speeding tickets or parking violations due to the correlates of where one most spends time is of course most likely a location where there is a high likelihood of violation. With regards to the applicability of the model with regards to even serious crimes, the model is based upon serial crimes, that is, a perpetrator who does so multiple times. Research suggests that as criminals gain experience there is a statistically significant correlation with the distance from home the criminal is (Snook 2004, p. 53). Further, in regards to burglary, there is the additional significant correlation of the time value of the crime with the distance traveled to commit the crime (Snook 2004, p. 55). While difficult to put a value on personal crimes, this finding may croak to crimes such as murder, arson or rape in which it is conceivable that victims could have some relative value to the criminal, similar to the monetary value gained from burglary. such(prenominal) a concept may partially explain that, as these types of criminal gain experience, they tend to venture out further from their base as they commit additional predatory crimes. In terms of geographical profiling and the case in which an investigator believes that a number of crimes have been committed by a single person, this has special significance as it can serve to focus the hunt for the offender in the vicinity of the first few crimes (Holmes Holmes 1996, p. 155).Of particular interest is that these methods can be utilized without the computer or complex mathematical algorithms. Studies indicated that, in lieu of years or experience or gut feelings, incorporating these methods patently as heuristic models whose basic precepts can be taught in a class, students can nearly equal the computerized version (Snook, Canter, Bennel 2002, pp. 116-117).Though all law enforcement ope rates with the tendency of catching the perpetrator, authorities do not have unlimited resources of time or finances to investigate all leads thoroughly. Geographical profiling also serves to focus the attention and other resources of an investigative department into the area in which validated statistics indicate there is is a pay-off. By using these methods, search costs can be minimized and offender can be apprehended faster, ideally prior to the accumulation of an additional victim that shows up as a barely data point on a geographic profile (Canter, Coffey, Huntley, Missen 2000, pp. 459-460).Works ConsultedCanter, D., T. Coffey, M. Huntley, C. Missen. (2000). Predicting Serial Killers Home Base Using a Decision Support arranging. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, (16), 4, pp. 457-478.Holmes, R. S. Holmes. (1996). Profiling Violent Crimes An Investigative Tool, 2nd Edition. Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, California.Snook, B., P. Taylor, C. Bennell. (2004). Geographic Profiling The Fast, Frugal and Accurate Way. Applied cognitive Psychology, (18), pp. 105-121.Snook, B., D. Canter, C. Bennel. (2002). Predicting the Home Location of Serial Offenders A Preliminary Comparison of the Accuracy of Human Judges with a Geographic Profiling System. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, (20), pp. 109-118.Snook, B. (2004). respective(prenominal) Differences in Distance Traveled by Serial Burglars. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, (1), pp. 53-66.Wilson, J. (2002, November). Mapping Murder. Geographical, (74), pp. 14-17.

Crisis and Emergency Intervention Treatment Options

Crisis and Emergency Intervention Treatment OptionsJohn C. HembyCrisis and Emergency InterventionTragedy in this twenty-four hours and age is commonplace. The same can be said of school violence and shootings in those schools. As a crisis worker, I need to become familiar with this ply and learn on how to help those who survive this ordeal. First, I will need to look at an incident and study it. I chose the incident at Virginia tech on April 16, 2007. This is the deadliest shooting in U.S. History. There were 32 students and teachers to die by the hands of this sweep awayer. They were gunned down on the campus Virginias Polytechnic Institute and State University. The killer was a student that happened to go to that school. His name was Seung Hui Cho. He would be dupe number 33, as he ended his spiritedness as police were terminal in on him. (Worst U.S. Shooting Ever, n.d.). It take offed on the morning of April 16, 2007. Mr. Cho was 23 and majoring in English while at the scho ol. He started his cleanup spree by murdering a female freshman and a male RA (resident assistant) in a dormitory before leaving the building (Worst U.S. Shooting Ever, n.d.). The police soon came on the scene, however, were unaware of the shooters identity. Then at al just round 10 oclock, Cho struck again he was armed with a 9- millimeter and a 22- caliber pistol with an overwhelming amount of ammunition. He entered the classroom building and locked several of the doors behind him, pr iteming escape. afterwardswards, he went into each classroom and began firing (Worst U.S. Shooting Ever, n.d.). After 10 minutes of continuous carnage, he in like mannerk his own biography. The incidents death toll was 32 and 17 wounded. But that wasnt the end of it around two days later, NBC News received a package that Cho had sent. The package contained photos of him posing with his weapons and a video dialogue on which he ranted about killing those wealthy brats (Worst U.S. Shooting Ever, n .d.).The police were baffled by this incident. They could feel no evidence that he targeted specifically any peerless of his victims. Cho was born in South Korean and had travel to the United States with his family back in the 1990s. The public in any case found out that his classmates described him as a loner, and had a long dated history with psychic health issues. It was also later revealed that Cho had written a plethora of assignments that exhibited his aggressive and violent nature to the point that his professors had some concern for his well- be, but nonhing was do (Worst U.S. Shooting Ever, n.d.).Now that I chip in studied the material and summarized the incident, I can now get to my assessment and courses of action. My assessment would own to be that the most people that would be traumatized by this are the wounded. They not only suffered physical trauma but mental anguish as well those individuals should be interact mentally as soon as possible (Littleton, H. 201 1). The secondary victims are the friends and family of those victims along with people that were on campus that day. They should be given an opportunity for counseling and or group therapy as well. The tertiary victims or third concern would be the personnel who were on the ground during that incident, whether they were police, ems or faculty (Littleton, H. 2011). These people already have access to mental health providers and I would touch base with their respective provider to see if there was any extra counseling assistance that they whitethorn need in order for their personnel to be back to normal.My courses of action are fairly simple. For the commencement concern, I would outline one on one counseling sessions with the 17 wounded. After my initial assessment of them, I would then see if they needed additional crisis counseling or if they didnt, I would still give them my contact information just in case. For those that wanted additional assistance or that I felt that neede d more counseling, I would go frontwards and outline a preaching plan with them. The second group I would translate and utilize group therapy. All of them have a connection to the first group, so that commonality would be a great place to start. Then, I would heed to their concerns or issues they might have. While auditory sense to all of them, I would save up down those that bet to have an issue coping with what they just experienced (Littleton, H. 2011). Those individuals would be then given my contact information so I whitethorn give them a proper assessment to see if they need one on one crisis counseling. The third group I wouldnt be too concerned about as I had stated earlier, they have their own professional mental health providers. However, I would avail myself to them to see if they needed additional assistance and we would go from there if that were the case. I would like to do a one on one crisis intervention session with a survivor of the incident. These individual s seem like they would need the most help. According to the text, during any single-session intervention, the crisis worker must accomplish three pivotal or essential goals (Collins Collins, 2005). Those three goals are the victim or survivors personal safety, manage short-term master of the incident in order to keep moving on in life and lastly, the crisis worker must be able-bodied to show the individual there is help out there whether its physical, mental or spiritual assets. However, this is difficult because a survivor usually has the hardest time to cope with what happened at the incident. The crisis intervention model seems appropriate to use in this situation.The first note is to empathize with the clients ordeal, how they are feeling and support their decision in getting assistance or help. This could be done by letting them tell their story and listening intently (Collins Collins, 2005). Then, I would also involve how they felt during the incident and rightly at tha t moment. The second step involves safety in all aspects of the crisis. This is done by showing them that the crisis is over and that steps have been taken to ensure that the crisis wouldnt happen again i.e. increased law enforcement on campus and training that involves resident assistants and college professors. I could also show the survivor that if they wanted to feel safer, they should take a self-defense class or carry a weapon of some kind. This produces a kind of empowerment and usefulness to the survivor, thus promoting their safety.The third step would be the most difficult, due to the fact that the survivor would have to recall certain situations. They would have to relive the moments leading up to the event and afterwards. This would take a while and it would be pivotal for me as a crisis worker to listen and be empathic the whole time. When the survivor finally starts to cleared up, I would try my best to point out any feelings of paranoia or fears while trying to stil l listen (Collins Collins, 2005). If the survivor had divulged that they felt these issues, I would then ask them to take a step back and look at the event, if they could Then, I would ask if they could see if what theyre feeling is because of the shooter or if its just from the trauma and show them that they can deal with it. Afterwards, I would ask if there was anything else that happened if they felt comfortable full to continuing on reliving the event. If the survivor chose to continue, they whitethorn learn something new that they hadnt seen or realized before when retelling their story.The fourth step is to for this survivor is to start a discussion on making new plans. It would be at this point that I would ask the survivor on how they felt about freeing to another school in order to finish their degree, or just getting away from that university in general in order to get a new start. If the survivor liked that idea, I would ask how you would go about doing that and what resources do you have to make that a reality. I would also ask the survivor if they had any relatives or support systems that could help them move away and to start asking them for assistance. Afterwards, I would ask them to write down a pros and cons list of what would be better, to stay or leave (Collins Collins, 2005). Then, Id have them tally it up and tell me what they really feel when that possibility could be made into a reality, that would it really help them move on from the crisis.The fifth step is for the survivor to implement any plans they have for the future in order for them to move on. This would also include any additional counseling sessions they may need or if they just wanted to check-in from time to time, that would be great as well. throughout this last step, I would be empathetic and continue to tell the survivor whatever decision that they had made was a good choice in the right direction. Then, I would give the survivor my contact information so that the su rvivor could contact me when everything is settled. Lastly, if the survivor did want a follow-up meeting, I would then ask how they felt, how they were doing and if they were obtaining any of their goals that we had set out.Now that the one on one crisis intervention had passed, I would then focus on possible long term treatment goals for this survivor. A long term goal for this survivor is to ensure that they completed their education. This would be important to the survivor due to the fact that it would mean that the shooter did not deter them from their future plans in life. A second long term goal is to make sure that the survivor felt safe going anyplace at any time. This would prove that even though the world is a scary and eventful place, the survivor would be able to function in an open environment and not have any anxiety. A third goal is be able to absolve the shooter. The survivor must be able to forgive the shooter for his actions due to his mental instability. Unfortuna tely, the survivor cannot face the shooter but they can let them go and move on with their life. The plans outline would be something akin to the ongoing treatment plan in a crisis intervention model. The purpose of the ongoing plan is to provide a guideline or process of rebuilding ones life (Collins Collins, 2005). The first time I would meet with the survivor again after the crisis counseling is that I would try to get them to open up about what happened and observe to see if they were less apprehensive or emotionally distraught. They must be able to express themselves about what happened without too much emotional instability (Collins Collins, 2005). Then, it would be a confirmation that they had indeed moved on to the next chapter of their life. If the survivor was able to recall the event without too much emotional imbalance, I would move to the next part of the plan. The next step would be to see if the survivor had control of their life again. They must be able to enjoy li fe and do things that they want to do alternatively than be possessed by fear or anxiety.The following step is for the survivor to be able to recall what happened to them and they did in that event. The survivor must be able to see that it wasnt their fault for universe there at the wrong place at the wrong time that it just happened (Collins Collins, 2005). They must be able to realize that the incident was tragic but random, not planned. The fourth step in the ongoing treatment plan is developmental. The survivor was unexpectedly dealt a serious blow when the event occurred. At the time that the shooting occurred, the survivor may have been idle and not moved forward with their life. The survivor must be able to show that they are moving forward with their life goals, i.e. completing their degree (Collins Collins, 2005). Lastly, this step is to see how the survivors support systems are doing. I would ask them how their family is and if they were seeing anyone in particular if they werent married. I would then ask about any external support system groups such as church or a specific group. According to the text, being able to fully reintegrate with your new surroundings is a great indicator of moving on after the crisis (Collins Collins, 2005). The expected outcome for the survivor looks good. I think they will be able to move on from this tragedy and be a stronger person because of it.Sometime after I had aid the survivor, I would then debrief my coworkers and develop a self-plan and self-treatment plan so that I could mitigate the trauma exposure. According to the text, after a crisis or event subsides, a team member may need assistance in processing the experience and not be completely affected by it (Collins Collins, 2005). Essentially, the debriefing I would say would include all of the events prior to the intervention and during the intervention with the survivor. I would then divulge any emotional issues I was having and ask my coworkers for fee dback on how I handled the situation and what could I do better the next time.The self-care plan entails having six steps or guidelines. As mental health specialists, we sometime think we get laid whats best for us when it comes to certain issues. This would be what experts call burden of knowledge. We should look to our fellow crisis workers in order to assist us rather than trying to treat ourselves. After a crisis or traumatic event, sleep is the best ally. Studies show that people are more resilient to their trauma with a good nights rest (Collins Collins, 2005). The third item is that nobody is perfect. There will be some issues that can cause stress and may also trigger that traumatic events memories to come flooding back. However, if you remember to use your own coping strategies, i.e. go for a run, you should be able to mitigate that issue. The next item in the plan entails being able to ritualize the work that you accomplished for that event. A suggestion for myself would be to start a journal, detailing what happened prior to the crisis, during and afterwards, in order to keep perspective. The fifth detail in the plan is to being able to distance yourself from the work (Collins Collins, 2005). I find it refreshing if not spiritual, to go mountain climbing and look upon the horizon once you reach the summit. It helps put things in a certain order and allows me to be away from work, which was the cause of my distress. Lastly, I have to realize Im not alone in this endeavor. There were other crisis workers present during that event. Im sure if we got together and did a group therapy session, many of us would be relieved that we arent the only ones that experienced a side effect to those that we assisted during that time frame.In conclusion, I hope that my time with the survivor assisted them in moving on from the traumatic event Ill be charming due to my extensive training and the ability to distance myself from the person Im trying to assist while maintaining professionalism and the ability to empathize. Unfortunately, these tragedies are now being more and more commonplace. Therefore, it is up to us as the mental health providers to step up to the challenge and assist those that need it most.ReferencesCollins, B. G., Collins T. M. (2005). Crisis and Trauma Developmental-Ecological Intervention. Houghton Mifflin Publishing.Craig-Henderson, K. (2013). Youths who kill others in schools What we know from the emerging field of research on school shootings. PsycCRITIQUES, 58(24) Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/1366574193?accountid=8289Infoplease. (2008). Time line of recent worldwide school shootings. Retrieved May 17,2008 from, http//www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0777958.htmlLittleton, H., PhD., Kumpula, M., M.A., Orcutt, H., PhD. (2011). Posttraumatic symptoms following a campus shooting The role of psychosocial resource loss. Violence and Victims, 26(4), 461-76. Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/87889 5988?accountid=8289Worst U.S. Shooting Ever- kills 33 on Va. campus. (n.d.). Retrieved September 9, 2014, from http//www.nbcnews.com/id/18134671/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/worst-us shooting-ever-kills-va-campus/.VBXHkhbDXmE

The faces of the Goddess :: English Literature

The faces of the deitydessThroughout history women have em roleed themselves by taking on manydifferent titles and roles. This plunder be seen in the two allegoricalfantasy novels The Mists of Avalon and Forest house, both written byMarion Zimmer Bradley. In both novels we see the female protagonists bourgeon on many different roles as they move throughout the differentstages of their lives. In the novels it is believed that the Goddessshows herself in every woman. The stages and roles held by the twopriestesses, Morgaine and Eilan, represent the different forms theGoddess takes. Morgaine shows the Goddess inside her when she acts asthe Maiden or Virgin huntress, the Mother of all men and as the OldDeath-crone. These forms of the Goddess show themselves in Eilan asthe Maiden, the loving Mother and the madam of Ravens or Death-crone.Both Morgaines and Eilans actions throughout the novels show thatthey represent the three faces of the Goddess the Virgin Maiden, thelover of men and go ds the Mother, life-giver and caretaker of menand the Old Death-crone, killer of men.To begin, Morgaine represents the Virgin Maiden, the lover of the Godand Summer-king. This is shown when Morgaine is thinking to herselfabout her past while weaving a spell to kill Avalloch. She is planningto set her lover Accolon on the throne in the enthrone of Avalloch afterthe king Uriens dies. Morgaine speaks in her mindYears ago she had been the Virgin Huntress, blessing the Horned Oneand sending him forth to run with the deer and to get or die as theGoddess might decree. He had come back to her... now she was no longerthat Virgin, holding all the power of the Huntress. (The Mists ofAvalon 671)These lines show that Morgaine had at a time taken the form of the VirginGoddess who gives herself to the King Stag. She did the duty of theMaiden Goddess while she was young and a physical maiden by settingArthur the Stag-God on his throne. This is classic because she feelsnow that she must set the God on his throne again but this time in theform of Accolon. Morgaine worries though because she feels she nolonger has the power of the Maiden Huntress to do so. This shows thatMorgaine doubts that the Goddess and all her selves are within her.This occurs despite the fact that she had assumed the position ofMaiden before. Morgaine is still unlearned in the ways of the Goddessand deal the Maiden, she must set out on a spiritual journey toward

The Jonestown Massacre :: Papers

The Jonestown Massacre The Jonestown massacre was a horrible tragedy, which took the lives of over 900 innocent people and could possibly be the most corrupt and horrific try out the American government has ever done. To get to know about the massacre, you have to know a little about the man behind it all, Reverend Jim Jones. Jim Jones was the give-and-take of a Klansman and considered himself to be a reincarnation of both Jesus and Lenin. (Lenin was a Russian revolutionist who helped bring about socialism in Russia.) They say he was paranoid of the American government, but later, it was found that he worked for it. He was a well-known person in San Francisco because he was the leader of the Peoples Temple and also because of the occurrence that he was the Chairman of the Housing Department and he and his church service won many humanitarian awards. He was called Father by members of the Peoples Temple. The Peoples Temple was the so-called church that Jones established. People joined the Peoples Temple for different reasons a political statement, structure, discipline, or a way to escape from violence, alcohol and drugs. Whatever the reason they joined for, when they got in something kept them there. Jim Jones was a mastermind at brainwashing, and thats just what he did to all of his followers. He had many tactics he was an excellent speaker and was amazingly convincing, he staged fake healings, and used narcotics on his followers, so they would believe almost anything. As he was doing all this brainwashing he was stealing money from the people, raping the upstart women and girls of his church, and on top of it all, murdering those who seemed a threat to his church or attempted to leave. Eventually, The Peoples Temple was being investigated by the police, so Jim Jones moved it to the jungle of Guyana, he called this focalize Jonestown. Jonestown was his idea of the perfect community. It was base d on the ideals of socialism and communism, and everyone worked