Latin American Art Essay

Art is a form of expression. Paintings ar a form of visual cheat. Artists atomic number 18 the creators of visual forms of confabulation and their art whole kit and caboodle speak come out of the closet what is in their hearts and minds. Art in any form, music, forge or dance is n whiztheless a phraseology of the soul of the artist. Art of a period is a depiction and impact of the social, political, religious, cultural, traditional, geographical and social transcription prevalent at the time. Like the transformation of a person th clownish and through circumstances and experience, paintings too give change in their character in form, subject, and woof of colors, technique and style.Latin American art grew through the age of ancient folklore, to a combination of modernness to rebel against imperialism, colonialism, terrorism and dominance of the western globe surpassing the turbulence played by business relationship with the Latin American countries. They were plundere d and conquered innumerable multiplication and till today they fight for their identity element which is disintegration into the global world. The name of Mexican Artist Diego Rivera is historied as the master of cubism of the other(a) 20 century. His lams have gained immense popularity for their modernism and retention of originality.Diego was mesmerized by the reinvigorated style of painting lead by celebrated Spaniard Pablo Picasso in the cubist paintings by Diego so he mastered that style from 1913 and highly- real it in his later works. The Zapatista Landscape is a painting in the selfsame(prenominal) style. It is a landscape of the urban center of Zapatista. Juxtaposed with the geographical terrain of Zapatista, are the bold and pleasing pictures of guns, fragments of hu art object swashs in the fannydrop of nature. Bold lines are absent entirely the distinction of shapes is vivid in the painting. in that revere is an indication of texture and the strokes of th e sail are smooth.The landscape showers a powerful broadcast of blinding light from supra in the painting. colour in are not representational still expressive. skilful to its time, the landscape breaks rapidly precisely identical the remnant and damage of the culture and traditions at the mercy of those who command over them then. The Zapatista landscape, by Diego Rivera, the master of cubism, is my choice because it has a tremendous visual impact and bursts with vibrant colors. The scrap image of another artist of the period is that of Joaquin Torres Garcia. His snare metaphysical work captivates the viewer because of its grid shapes and dissimilar style.His paintings locution like murals on a wall, where geometrical shapes are made to date unique by the effect of metal-looking colors. Numbers, dimensions and shapes comprise his visual portrayal. Torres Garcia developed his own style called the constructivist Art in the early 20 century. He returned to his roots af ter several(prenominal) years in Europe and America. A man without any family ties, Joaquin was brave and confident to try out new styles of his own but wanted to carry the tribal art and geometrical organization of expressions on the button like the Inca Civilization and Peruvian art.He use the golden mean to express his art. The distinct feature of his paintings is their irregular grid purse and the signs embedded into each. His paintings look as though they have been made on walls and not on canvas. The play of light and civilization is subtle. His colors are representational but they inhibit the eye by their abstract subjects. His paintings are real fascinating as we do not visualise their theme at first instance. They make you look at them for hours and to penetrate into every detail to date the interesting message from the mind of Garcia.There is a three dimensional effect but in that respect is no perspective to his paintings. They look flat but the grid looks as tho ugh each gentleman is an elevated metal sheet with figures and forms on it. There is a balance of spatial relationship but no attempt at creating illusions. The luster of metals is an crotchety method of Garcias works. His creations speak about spirituality, religion, guess and universality. His deep belief in traditions of ancient civilizations like the Inca, surfaces uncloudedly in his works. They signify the resistance he felt towards the dominance of European art.His works repeat feelings of identity crisis of the Latin American people and revolution against the degradation of their culture. His subject is not human forms but a connection to the universe and the eternity of the soul. The inquire of the two different paintings is their diverse subject, theme, style, color schemes and effects. besides the message is unmistakably the same. Search of identities Unity amidst assortment How do they stand out alone and stock-still combine to form such a salutary pair? The Zapatista by Diego Rivera is like a bright flower struggling for survival and fighting its rough terrain.It evokes a feeling of admiration for an individuals self esteem. The painting by Joaquin Torres Garcia, with its grid base and earthy metallic colors evokes a respect for some one who is trying to make a place for himself in a world that refuses him the identity and dignity he deserves. Disparity, unrest, between classes of society, in the leash world and western countries, the message of rebellion, liberty from inhibition by power of education, wealth, industry and might, is the loud and clear evocation of both the works.The Zapatista, Diegos work promotes a message of patriotism through his painting, while Joaquin achieves it by his systematic grid base in his work. The grid base gives a rational approach to art while the abstract forms connect creativity to the supreme unknown realms of the Universe. Beautiful landscape of Zapatista projects peace and consistency with it s blue sky, brown mountains and green trees but is pose by brightly colored pictures of guns and dark odd eyes of the innocent citizens, of the revolutionaries who were desperate to break free from the ramshackle of their present.Garcia vividly demarcates visual matter by geometrical grids, blended into abstract forms and Diego uses cubism to arouse feelings in his work. But there is a harmony of judgment which binds both these paintings into a single message. That of an uprising billow in the hearts of sensitive people of Latin America and their struggle to retain their identity in the emerging new world. Together they resonate the same ultimate yearning of mankind. To rise up above time and to live up to eternity. Stare at them and they speak out to you. Call you towards them and throw you back if you do not understand the message they are giving.Zapatista landscape beckons all those who have migrated to affluent countries in quest of their unfulfilled dreams. It brings out si ghs of nostalgia and tears of rage, perfidy and fear when you look at it. Garcias work attracts you like a magnet to metal. The lustrous metallic shine with abstract intriguing signs, get embossed on your mind. They lead you to believe that art and creativity are a science and can be portrayed through numbers. See each one in a different light and when unneurotic they tell the same story. Like a impudently married couple, coming from two different corners of the world.With two different upbringings but united for life to research the same purpose. That of procreation. Of giving birth to a new world, full of hope, happiness and universal bliss. Not just for themselves but for the Universe as a whole. works CitedDiego Rivera (Mexico), Zapatista Landscape, 1915, 29 November 2008. Joaquin Torres-Garcia (Uruguay), Abstract Metaphysical Forms, 1930, 29 November 2008